Observational study reveals varied psychological and training outcomes across racial groups in helping skills classrooms, highlighting the complex impact of classroom demographics.
We examined the effects of racial/ethnic diversity and numeric marginalization on learning outcomes (changes in counseling self-efficacy, self-stigma for seeking counseling, and mental health) with 402 students in 30 sections of helping skills classes. Students self-identified as African American, Asian, Hispanic/Latinx, Other, or White. We operationalized class diversity with the diversity index developed by Chang (1999) and numeric marginalization as the percentage of students in the class that shared a target student's identity. Using two-level Hierarchical Linear Modeling (HLM; students nested within classes), we predicted counseling self-efficacy, counseling self-stigma, and mental health from student identity (Level 1), and the cross-level interaction between diversity and numeric marginalization (Level 2). Results suggested that classroom diversity had no effects on counseling self-efficacy but was associated with greater self-stigma. However, more classroom diversity was linked with better mental health for Latinx students. With African American students, numeric marginalization was associated with more counseling self-stigma. Surprisingly, for Asian students, numeric marginalization (i.e., a greater percentage of Asian students in a classroom) was linked with worse mental health. Finally, diversity had no effects on outcomes for White students. Findings demonstrate the importance of racial/ethnic composition in helping skills courses. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ahn et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: