Randomized trial evaluates how crop diversification impacts GHG emissions and soybean yield under no-till management, suggesting sustainable farming methods.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of crop diversification on the soil emissions of CO₂, CH₄, and N₂O in soybean production systems under no-till management in the Brazilian Cerrado. Five production systems were analyzed: soybean–maize succession (S1); soybean–Urochloa ruziziensis succession (S2); soybean–crotalaria succession followed by maize intercropped with U. ruziziensis (S3); rotation of soybean and crotalaria followed by soybean and maize intercropped with U. ruziziensis for 12 months (S4); rotation of soybean and millet followed by soybean and crotalaria; and finally, maize intercropped with U. ruziziensis (S5). The highest greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions occurred during the rainy season, regardless of the production system. For CO₂, between 56% and 65% of the annual emissions occurred during this period. With respect to CH₄, system S3 presented the highest average emission (0.44 kg ha⁻¹), followed by S1 (0.37 kg ha⁻¹) and S5 (0.19 kg ha⁻¹). For N₂O, systems S1 and S2 emitted an average of 0.38 kg ha⁻¹ of N‒N₂O during the rainy season, which were 30%, 40%, and 45% greater than those observed in systems S3, S4, and S5, respectively. The more diversified agricultural systems proved to be a strategic and promising alternative for reducing GHG emissions in Cerrado soils, contributing to more sustainable and efficient agriculture.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Coutinho et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: