Rejoinder to the discussion on ‘‘Nonparanormal Adjusted Marginal Inference’’

Susanne Dandl; Torsten Hothorn

doi:10.1093/biomtc/ujag069

March 30, 2026Biometrics

Rejoinder to the discussion on ‘‘Nonparanormal Adjusted Marginal Inference’’

View at Publisher

Ask AI

Bookmark

Share

Key Points

This rejoinder aims to clarify and refine points raised in discussions about nonparanormal adjusted marginal inference.
Addressed discussions from three reviewers
Provided clarifications and refinements based on critiques
Improved understanding of nonparanormal adjusted marginal inference
Clarified statistical models used in the original manuscript

Implication

Rejoinder refines statistical analysis techniques in nonparanormal adjusted marginal inference, addressing critiques.

Abstract

This rejoinder addresses the three discussions of our manuscript on "Nonparanormal Adjusted Marginal Inference". We appreciate the thoughtful assessments and provide clarifications and refinements in response to the points raised.

Discussion

No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.

Cite This Study

Dandl et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69fc2c718b49bacb8b3480b3 https://doi.org/10.1093/biomtc/ujag069

View at Publisher

Ask AI

Bookmark

Share

Rejoinder to the discussion on ‘‘Nonparanormal Adjusted Marginal Inference’’

Key Points

Implication

Abstract

Discussion

Cite This Study

Rejoinder to the discussion on ‘‘Nonparanormal Adjusted Marginal Inference’’

Key Points

Implication

Abstract

Discussion

Cite This Study

Keep reading

Keep reading