Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
December 17, 2002International Journal of Integrated CareOpen Access

Statistical significant change versus relevant or important change in (quasi) experimental design: some conceptual and methodological problems in estimating magnitude of intervention-related change in health services research

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

BMBerrie MiddelUniversity Medical Center GroningenESEric van SonderenUniversity Medical Center Groningen

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Implication

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Cite This Study

Middel et al. (2002) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69fcb0c79e6ef74da178e818https://doi.org/10.5334/ijic.65
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1The Assessment of ADL among Frail Elderly in an Interview Survey: Self-report versus Performance-Based Tests and Determinants of Discrepancies1996 · 235 citations
  2. 2Perceived Change Among Participants in an Exercise Program for Older Adults1990 · 95 citations
  3. 3A Patient-Specific Measure of Change in Maximal Function1986 · 60 citations
  4. 4Can shared care deliver better outcomes for patients undergoing total hip replacement?2000 · 7 citations
  5. 5Treatment of panic disorder with agoraphobia: comparison of fluvoxamine, placebo, and psychological panic management combined with exposure and of exposure in vivo alone1995 · 146 citations