We report for the first time experimental investigations on SOI, Si <inf xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">1-x</inf> Ge <inf xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">x</inf> OI & GeOI Tunnel FET (TFET). These devices were fabricated using a Fully Depleted SOI CMOS process flow with high k-metal gate stack, enabling 2 decades lower IOFF (~30fA/µm) compared to co-processed CMOS. We successfully solve the TFET bipolar parasitic conduction by a novel TFET architecture, the Drift Tunnel FET (DTFET), with improved OFF state control. Concerning the ON current issue, we improve the SOI p (resp. n) TFET I <inf xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">ON</inf> by a factor 55 (resp. 8) by source-drain profiles optimization (via spacers & extensions). Moreover, we demonstrate for the first time functional TFET & CMOS devices on Si <inf xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">1-x</inf> Ge <inf xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">x</inf> OI (x=15-30-100%) co-integrated with the same SOI process flow, enabling TFET ION continuous improvement with Ge content increase: I <inf xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">ON</inf> x2700 for GeOI (compared to SOI).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mayer et al. (2008) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: