Why the study?
CMR enables accurate RV assessment, but the extent of concomitant RV involvement in patients with primary left ventricular delayed enhancement was not well defined.
What is the prevalence of right ventricular delayed enhancement in patients with left ventricular delayed enhancement, and how does it affect biventricular functional parameters?
What is the prevalence of right ventricular delayed enhancement in patients with left ventricular delayed enhancement, and how does it affect biventricular functional parameters?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Right ventricular delayed enhancement is present in approximately 30% of patients with left ventricular delayed enhancement and is associated with worse biventricular systolic function and increased left ventricular volumes.
Cardiac Magnetic Resonance (CMR) allows an accurate Right Ventricle (RV) assessment that could be of great relevance in diseases causing inflammation or fibrosis. The aim of this study was to evaluate the concomitant involvement of the RV in patients with delayed enhancement (DE) of the Left Ventricle (LV-DE) using CMR. We retrospectively enrolled 95 (male n. 66; age 55±18years; BMI 26±5kg/m2) consecutive patients with LV-DE who underwent a CMR (Achieva 1.5 T, Philips) for different indications: post-ischemic dilated cardiopathy (PDM), hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM), myocardial infarction (MI), myocarditis/pericarditis (MP) and congenital heart disease (CD). We assessed the presence and extension of DE and functional parameters such as ventricular end-diastolic (EDV), end-systolic volumes (ESV) and ejection fraction (EF) of both LV and RV. Prevalence of RV-DE was 30.5% (29/95): 75% (3/4) for CD, 44% (4/9) for PDM, 36% (17/47) for MI, 27.8% (5/18) for MP and 0% (0/17) for HCM. LV-EF and RV-EF were 53±15mL and 51±13mL, respectively, for patients without RV-DE (RV-DE-), and 40±19 mL and 42±15 mL, respectively, for patients with RV-DE (RV-DE+) (p<0.05), while LV-EDV and LV-ESV were 80±28 mL and 40±26 mL, respectively, for RV-DE- and 100±45 mL and 65±49 mL, respectively, for RV-DE+ (p<0.05). The prevalence of RV-DE in patients with LV primary involvement is not negligible and it is found mainly in patients with CD and PDM and then in patients with MI and MP. It is more often associated with LV-EF and RV-EF reduction and increase in LV volumes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Toia et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: