Key result
QUALINEURO-REHAB evaluates home-based neuro-cardiac rehabilitation for quality of life in complex congenital heart disease.
Why the study?
Neurodevelopmental impairments and physical deconditioning are common long-term morbidities in congenital heart disease, and holistic neuro-cardiac training interventions may improve physical and mental health in youth with CHD.
Does a 12-week home-based neuro-cardiac rehabilitation programme improve health-related quality of life in patients aged 8-25 years with complex congenital heart disease?
RCT (n=192)
Single-blind (outcome assessors/neuropsychologists are blinded)
1:1 computer-generated assignment sequence, stratified by country and age group
Yes
Does a 12-week home-based neuro-cardiac rehabilitation programme improve health-related quality of life in patients aged 8-25 years with complex congenital heart disease?
Protocol for this RCT published; leaves open whether home-based neuro-cardiac rehab improves HRQoL in youth with complex CHD.
INTRODUCTION: Neurodevelopmental impairments and physical deconditioning are the most common long-term morbidities in congenital heart disease (CHD). Holistic interventions including combined neuro-cardiac training may improve physical and mental health in youth with CHD. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a European multicentre, two-arm randomised controlled study to test the efficacy of a home-based neuro-cardiac rehabilitation programme including physical activity and neuropsychological training versus the standard of care in children, adolescents and young adults with complex CHD. Patients aged 8-25 years who underwent infant surgical and/or catheter-based cardiac interventions will be randomly allocated to either an intervention group including a 12-week home-based cardiovascular rehabilitation and executive function training or to a control group. All participants will undergo a baseline assessment and a 12-month follow-up. The primary outcome is the difference in change in the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory self-reported health-related quality of life score between baseline and final assessment for the intervention versus the control group. Secondary outcomes include standardised neuropsychological measures of executive function, social cognition and mental health. Cardiovascular secondary outcomes include cardiopulmonary fitness parameters such as maximum oxygen uptake, muscular strength and level of physical activity. Efficacy of the intervention will be evaluated by comparing within-subject group differences from baseline to 12-month follow-up, using an intention-to-treat analysis. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The trial protocol was first approved by the sponsor's drawn National Ethics Committee (CPP Paris-III, number 2023-A00038-37) and registered on Clinicaltrial.gov (number NCT05670132). It was also approved by Ethics Committees in Germany (Technische Universitat Munchen, number 2023-276-S-KH) and Belgium (UCLouvain, number B4032025000116). TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05670132.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Calderon et al. (2026) conducted an RCT in Congenital heart disease (n=192). Home-based neuro-cardiac rehabilitation program vs. Standard of care was evaluated on Change in the self-reported total score of the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory V.4.0 Generic Core (PedsQL 4.0) questionnaire between baseline and 12-month follow-up. The QUALINEURO-REHAB trial will investigate whether a 12-week home-based neuro-cardiac rehabilitation program improves self-reported health-related quality of life compared to standard of care in 192 patients aged 8 to 25 years with complex congenital heart disease.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: