PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
October 1, 1981Circulation738 citationsOpen Access

A new, simplified and accurate method for determining ejection fraction with two-dimensional echocardiography.

View Full Paper
Miguel A. Quiñones
Miguel A. QuiñonesCardiac Imaging
AWAlan D. WaggonerCincinnati Children's Hospital Medical CenterLRLawrence A. RedutoSt. Francis Hospital

Structured PICO

Does a new simplified 2-D echocardiography method accurately determine left ventricular ejection fraction compared to gated cardiac blood pool imaging and cineangiography in nonselected patients?

P
Population
58 nonselected patients (55 with satisfactory 2-D echoes, of which 42 had coronary artery disease)
I
Intervention
A new simplified method to determine left ventricular ejection fraction (EF) using wide-angle, two-dimensional echocardiography (2-D echo) without planimetry or computer assistance
C
Comparator
EF by gated cardiac blood pool imaging (n=55) and EF by single-plane cineangiography (n=35)
O
Outcome
Accuracy of EF determination (correlation with gated cardiac blood pool imaging and cineangiography)surrogate

A simplified 2-D echocardiography method accurately determines left ventricular ejection fraction without the need for planimetry or computer assistance.

Abstract

A new method to determine left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (EF) with wide-angle, two-dimensional echocardiography (2-D echo) has been developed using the parasternal long-axis, apical four-chamber and apical long-axis views. End-diastolic and end-systolic measurements of LV short axes at the base and mid-LV cavity in the parasternal long-axis view and at the upper, middle and lower thirds of the cavity in the apical views are made, from which an averaged minor axis at end-diastolic and at end-systole is calculated. Fractional shortening of the LV long axis (delta L) is estimated from apical contraction. Satisfactory 2-D echoes were obtained in 55 of 58 nonselected patients (all three views in 32 patients, two views in 22 and one view in one); 42 of 55 patients had coronary artery disease. EF by 2-D echo was compared with EF by gated cardiac blood pool imaging in all patients (r = 0.927, SEE = 6.7%) and to EF by single-plane cineangiography (angio) in 35 of 55 patients (r = 0.913, SEE = 7.4%). LV dyssynergy was frequently present and involved the apex in 29 of 55 patients. Using angio as the standard for evaluating wall motion at the apex, 2-D echo was 100% sensitive and specific in detecting abnormal apical wall motion. We conclude that EF can be determined accurately with 2-D echo in a large group of patients with and without dyssynergy by a simple method that eliminates the need for planimetry or computer assistance.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Quiñones et al. (1981) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69fd294030a474415f89e0e5https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.64.4.744
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper