Key result
Longitudinal apical LV length change identifies normal LVEF with ~99% diagnostic accuracy.
Why the study?
The standard biplane Simpson method for estimating LVEF has limitations with poor image quality or subjective interpretation, prompting evaluation of whether LVEF can be reliably estimated using simpler apical four-chamber views.
Does longitudinal apical LV length change reliably estimate LVEF compared to the biplane Simpson method in patients undergoing echocardiography?
Observational (n=260)
No
Does longitudinal apical LV length change reliably estimate LVEF compared to the biplane Simpson method in patients undergoing echocardiography?
Effect estimate: AUC 0.988 (95% CI 0.966-0.997)
p-value: p=<0.0001
Simple measurements of longitudinal apical LV length changes between systole and diastole can serve as a reliable surrogate for LVEF, offering a rapid bedside alternative to the biplane Simpson method.
BACKGROUND: Accurate estimation of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) is vital in cardiology practice for diagnostic, prognostic, and management decisions. The biplane Simpson method is the standard but can be subject to limitations, particularly in cases of poor image quality or when subjective interpretation is involved. This study aims to evaluate whether LVEF can be reliably estimated using simpler apical four-chamber views without the need for complex calculations. METHODS: A retrospective review of 260 echocardiographic studies from the University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences database was conducted. LVEF was calculated using the Simpson's biplane method and compared with longitudinal apical LV length measurements in systole and diastole. Statistical analyses, including regression and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, were used to determine the relationship between LVEF and apical LV lengths. RESULTS: Patients were divided into two groups based on LVEF values (>50% normal, <50% reduced). Longitudinal apical LV length measurements demonstrated significant differences between the groups. Delta changes in LV length (>14 cm) showed high sensitivity (94.2%) and specificity (95.7%) in identifying normal LVEF. ROC analysis revealed that end-systolic lengths ≤7.3 cm could predict normal LVEF with good accuracy. CONCLUSIONS: Simple measurements of longitudinal apical LV length changes between systole and diastole can serve as a reliable surrogate for LVEF, offering a rapid bedside alternative to the biplane Simpson method. These findings highlight the potential for streamlining LVEF estimation, particularly in settings where time and resources are limited.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sawalha et al. (2025) conducted an observational in Evaluation of left ventricular ejection fraction (n=260). Longitudinal apical LV length measurements vs. Modified Simpson's biplane method was evaluated on Discrimination of normal versus reduced LVEF using delta change in longitudinal apical LV length (AUC 0.988, 95% CI 0.966-0.997, p=<0.0001). Delta changes in longitudinal apical left ventricular length between systole and diastole accurately identified normal left ventricular ejection fraction with a sensitivity of 94.2%, specificity of 95.7%, and an AUC of 0.988.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: