Why the study?
Does the presence of myocardial bridging and coronary spasm predict worse prognosis in patients with myocardial ischemia and non-obstructive coronary arteries?
Does the presence of myocardial bridging and coronary spasm predict worse prognosis in patients with myocardial ischemia and non-obstructive coronary arteries?
In patients with non-obstructive coronary artery disease, the combination of myocardial bridging and coronary spasm predicts a higher rate of angina-related hospitalizations despite a low rate of hard events.
MB with spasm identifies higher angina hospitalization risk in non-obstructive CAD; leaves open whether testing guides therapy.
<0.001) compared with patients without MB. In particular, the group of patients with MB and a positive acetylcholine test had the worst prognosis. Conclusions Among patients with NOCAD, coronary spasm associated with MB may predict a worse clinical presentation with MINOCA and a higher rate of hospitalization attributable to angina at long-term follow-up with a low rate of hard events.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Montone et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: