Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Evaluates street infrastructure preferences in transit users, highlighting safety and comfort differences by time of day.
• Street attributes show context-specific patterns in day and night route choice. • Daytime choices are associated with accessibility and comfort features. • Nighttime choices are associated with safety and security cues. • Preference heterogeneity appears across gender, age, and primary mode. • Findings support pedestrian-oriented design around transit stations. Understanding how street infrastructure influences route choices during access and egress walking trips is essential to promoting pedestrian-oriented environments around urban rail transit (URT) stations and extending their catchment areas. This study employed a visual route-choice experiment with 651 transit users in Guiyang, China, using a mixed logit model (MXL) incorporating interactions between individual characteristics and route attributes to evaluate preferences for street infrastructure during daytime and night-time walking. Results indicate that pedestrians favor routes to metro stations with narrower driveways, wider pavements, and tree- or hedge-lined walkways in the daytime. Adequate lighting and improved natural and mechanical surveillance effectively mitigate night-time security concerns. Preference heterogeneity was further observed across gender, age, and primary travel mode. The visualized experiment provides empirical evidence for designing pedestrian-friendly streets that enhance walking comfort and safety, thereby supporting sustainable transit use.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: