Evaluates the bioactivity of Butea monosperma kombucha, highlighting its functional beverage potential.
This study explores the novel utilization of Butea monosperma (Palash) flowers as a kombucha substrate instead of traditional black or green tea, providing new insights into plant-based fermentation systems and expanding the diversity of functional beverages. A traditional Indian medicinal flower, B. monosperma, is coveted for its abundance of flavonoids and polyphenols. The objectives were to evaluate changes in metabolomic and phytochemical processes over the 14-day fermentation period. While titratable acidity elevated to 1.95%, the fermentation process significantly reduced pH from 3.32 to 2.72 and total soluble solids from 11 to 5 °Brix. Diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl radical scavenging assay increased by 22.78% in the kombucha, indicating a significant improvement in antioxidant activity. Moreover, total phenolic content increased from 126.77 to 263.54 mg gallic acid equivalents/100 g, depicting enhanced bioactive potential. Additionally, total flavonoid content increased to 98.12 mg quercetin equivalents/ml. Attenuated total reflectance Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy confirmed the formation of functional compounds, including hydroxyl, carbonyl, and aromatic groups, indicative of the development of organic acids and polyphenols. High-resolution accurate mass spectrometry analysis demonstrated newly formed metabolites, such as homobutein 4-glucoside, quercetin-3β-D-glucoside, and salicylic acid derivatives, supporting robust microbial biotransformation and metabolic enrichment. Microbial growth increased from day 1 to 6.65 and day 14 to 9.18 logarithmic colony-forming units per milliliter over the fermentation period. These findings demonstrate that fermentation effectively enhances the bioactivity of B. monosperma , supporting its potential as a functional, antioxidant-rich fermented beverage and highlighting the value of traditional Indian botanicals in food innovation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bharti et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: