Evaluates solar-driven methanol steam reforming performance in Cu/ZnO/Al2O3 catalyst, indicating significant advancements.
Photothermal catalysis integrates photochemical and thermochemical effects, offering a promising pathway for solar-driven methanol steam reforming (MSR). However, traditional catalysts exhibit limited light utilization and insufficient low-temperature activity, and most studies remain at the laboratory scale under simulated light without on-sun performance testing. In this work, a hydrotalcite-like Cu/ZnO/Al2O3 catalyst is developed, with performance evaluated through laboratory experiments and on-sun prototype testing at a scale of 2.5 Nm3·h–1. The layered structure of the catalyst enables broadband light absorption and enhances low-temperature performance. Under indoor illumination at 180 °C, the optimized catalyst achieves a methanol conversion of 78.9% and a H2 production rate of 14.2 μmol·g–1·s–1. These represent relative increases of 163.9% and 173.1% over thermocatalysis, while reducing the reaction temperature by approximately 40 °C. The catalyst maintains stable activity during a 10 h test. Mechanistic studies reveal that the layered hydrotalcite-like structure and strong Cu-ZnO interaction enhance light absorption and charge transfer, lowering the apparent activation energy under illumination by 80.7%. In situ DRIFTs analysis indicates that illumination promotes the formation and conversion of key intermediates, facilitating methanol activation. Furthermore, the catalyst is tested on a trough solar photothermal prototype under on-sun conditions. It achieves a methanol conversion of 78.1% and a hydrogen production rate of 2.5 Nm3·h–1 during 1.5 h of continuous operation. The H2/CO2 ratio remains near the theoretical 3:1 stoichiometry, demonstrating stability and high selectivity. This work, from mechanistic study to on-sun testing, highlights the potential of photothermal MSR for practical production of sustainable solar fuels.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yuan et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: