Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Investigating flow and bubble dynamics in stopper valves reveals effects of geometry on cavitation behavior.
We investigated the flow and bubble dynamics in a stopper control valve as used in continuous casting of steel under flow conditions where cavitation or quick degassing is expected to occur. We compare the flow of a typical control stopper with four archetypical stoppers. The effect of stopper geometry on cavitation dynamics is studied experimentally in a downscaled two-dimensional water model. High-speed imaging in combination with pressure data sheds light on the performance of the various stopper geometries under cavitating and non-cavitating conditions. It is found that a blunt-ended stopper shape induces, under all conditions, a strong flow separation leading to a large pressure loss coefficient, K . In return we find that the controllability of the flow improves while K changes only marginally when entering a cavitating flow regime. In contrast, more streamlined stoppers show a lower K that yet sharply increases at the onset of cavitation; possibly causing instability in valve throughput. • Flow and bubble dynamics in stopper control valves are investigated under cavitating and non-cavitating conditions. • High-speed imaging and pressure measurements reveal distinct cavitation behaviors for different stopper shapes. • Blunt-ended stoppers induce strong flow separation, resulting in high, but stable pressure loss coefficients. • Streamlined stoppers exhibit lower pressure loss but increased instability at the onset of cavitation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hogendoorn et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: