Identifies FDA-approved drugs inhibiting FIP virus replication with synergistic effects.
Feline infectious peritonitis (FIP), caused by feline coronavirus (FCoV) remains a critical therapeutic challenge with no universally approved treatments. We employed a drug repurposing strategy targeting the viral main protease (3CLpro), essential for FCoV replication. Virtual screening of FDA-approved drugs identified 15 candidates, with three─saquinavir (antiretroviral), lumacaftor (CFTR corrector), and gliquidone (antidiabetic)─demonstrating notable antiviral activity. Postentry antiviral assays (cytopathic effect reduction, immunoperoxidase staining, RT-qPCR) yielded EC50 values of 0.25–0.48 μM (saquinavir), 30.32–58.49 μM (lumacaftor), and 48.85–51.28 μM (gliquidone). We validated 3CLpro inhibition using an intracellular dual-luciferase reporter assay designed to simultaneously account for compound cell penetration and metabolic stability. This confirmed specific protease inhibition with IC50 values of 23.70 ± 1.38 μM (saquinavir) and 38.68 ± 1.59 μM (lumacaftor), and 82.52 ± 1.50 μM (gliquidone). Synergy analysis with established anti-FIP agents (GC376, remdesivir, GS-441524, and molnupiravir) using SynergyFinder 3.0 revealed strong synergistic interactions: saquinavir + GC376 (mean ZIP score: 54.59), lumacaftor + GC376 (mean ZIP: 21.44), and gliquidone + remdesivir (mean ZIP: 24.13). Notably, optimal synergistic doses achieved 0.97–2.03 log10 viral suppression using only 20–50% of individual drug EC50 values, concurrently modulating viral-induced cytokine expression (TNF-α, IFN-β, and IL-6) in CRFK cells (p < 0.05). These rational combinations enable substantial dose reduction, offering practical strategies to improve treatment accessibility, reduce costs, and minimize adverse effects. This study establishes a framework for repurposing FDA-approved drugs in FIP therapy and supports translational evaluation of these combination regimens.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lueangaramkul et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: