Pilot study assesses the feasibility and safety of elevated leg positioning in acute ischemic stroke patients, indicating potential benefits.
Background and aims Optimization of cerebral perfusion through nonpharmacological hemodynamic interventions, particularly patient positioning, has shown promise as a cost-effective strategy for improving acute ischemic stroke (AIS) outcomes; however, current evidence remains inconsistent. We aimed to assess the feasibility, safety, and potential clinical benefit of elevated leg positioning (ELP) in AIS. Methods This prospective, randomized, open-label, and blinded-endpoint pilot study included moderate anterior circulation AIS patients with probable large artery atherosclerosis etiology who were ineligible for reperfusion therapy. Eligible patients were randomized (1:1) to receive either 30° ELP initiated within 24 hours of ictus, or standard care. Primary endpoints were intervention feasibility and safety, assessed by protocol adherence and the frequency of prespecified positioning-related adverse events. Secondary endpoints were 90-day favorable functional outcomes (modified Rankin Scale score: 0-2), and 30-day all-cause mortality. Results Fifty patients were randomized (n=25 per group). Protocol adherence was 96.0% (24/25) in the intervention group, with one patient unable to tolerate ELP. Three patients (6.0%) were lost to follow-up. Prespecified adverse events occurred in 4.2% (1/24) of the intervention group and 8.0% (2/25) of the control group; no serious adverse events observed. Favorable functional outcome at 90 days occurred in 62.5% (14/24) in the intervention group versus 47.8% (11/23) in the control group; 30-day mortality was 8.3% (2/24) versus 13.0% (3/23), respectively. Conclusions ELP was feasible and demonstrated an acceptable safety profile in moderate anterior circulation AIS; observed trends in functional outcomes and survival provide preliminary indications of benefit, supporting further evaluation in a definitive randomized trial. Conflict of interest Bonifacio C. Pedregosa II, MD: nothing to disclose. Jose C. Navarro, MD, MSc: nothing to disclose.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pedregosa et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: