Examines fair pricing in non-competitive stochastic games, suggesting new insights for Bitcoin protocol.
We introduce the concept of arbitrable stochastic games, which appears to be new. To do so, we consider a reward criterion different from the standard gamma-weighted criterion. This allows us to define the fair price to play a non-competitive stochastic game. We then illustrate the concept through three variations of the classical coin-toss game with chips, providing proofs via Doob’s theorem for supermartingales and practical algorithms. These examples deepen our understanding of the Bitcoin protocol.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Grunspan et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: