Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Understanding analytical results in visual data analysis is essential to inform further exploration and decision-making. However, existing tools often visualize the results alone, offering limited access to associated contexts needed to explain why the results occur. To address this gap, we propose CAMV, a framework that automatically extracts relevant contextual information from given results and datasets, and generates multi-view visualizations to support deeper understanding. CAMV consists of two major components: one that identifies key data subspaces and fact types as explanatory context, and the other that generates coordinated multi-view visualizations of both the analysis results and their contextual information. Based on the framework, we developed an interactive prototype and conducted a comparison study with 12 participants, using GPT-4o as a baseline. Results show that CAMV enhances understanding, decision-making speed, and trust compared to GPT-4o, with positive feedback on its data-grounded reasoning and structured output.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lin et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: