Retrospective cohort analysis shows intravenous thrombolysis improves outcomes in acute ischemic stroke, indicating treatment efficacy.
Background and aims To characterize and compare clinical profiles, care times, and functional outcomes in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) in the Peruvian healthcare system using real-world data from the RES-Q registry. Methods We conducted a retrospective multicenter cohort study including adult patients with AIS registered in RES-Q between January 2023 and June 2025 across five hospitals in Peru. The primary exposure was intravenous thrombolysis (IVT). Results Among 1,780 AIS patients, 252 (14.2%) received IVT. Despite presenting with more severe strokes (higher median NIHSS, p<0.001), thrombolyzed patients achieved higher rates of functional independence at discharge compared with non-IVT patients (50.7% vs. 38.3%, p<0.001). In multivariable analysis, absence of IVT was independently associated with poor functional outcome (adjusted OR 1.30). Median door-to-needle time was 68 minutes. Rates of in-hospital mortality were similar between groups (7.14% vs. 5.76%, p=0.389), and sICH rates remained low. Independent predictors of poor functional outcome included higher NIHSS (aOR 1.20 per point, 95% CI 1.16–1.24), older age (aOR 1.01 per year, 95% CI 1.00–1.02), and diabetes(aOR 1.45, 95% CI 1.05–1.99). Predictors of in-hospital mortality were NIHSS (aOR 1.25, 95% CI 1.19–1.32) and diabetes (aOR 2.21, 95% CI 1.12–4.38).. Conclusions his real-world multicenter Peruvian study demonstrates that IVT is feasible, safe, and associated with improved functional outcomes despite treatment of a more severely affected cohort. The findings highlight opportunities for quality improvement, particularly reducing door-to-needle times and improving access to reperfusion therapies. Conflict of interest Marla Gallo. nothing to disclose
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
GALLO et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: