Single-center retrospective cohort study demonstrates safe rescue stenting in patients with ICAD-related LVO, indicating potential for broader application.
Background and aims Intracranial atherosclerotic disease (ICAD) is a leading cause of acute ischemic stroke. When endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) fails due to underlying ICAD-related large vessel occlusion (LVO), rescue stenting becomes necessary. We introduce "submaximal" stenting—deliberate balloon-mounted stent deployment at sub-nominal pressures (6-7 atmospheres)—to minimize vessel wall trauma during emergency revascularization. This study evaluates the feasibility and safety of this novel technique. Methods This single-center retrospective cohort study evaluated patients undergoing acute rescue stenting with Resolute OnyxTM and Onyx FrontierTM drug-eluting stents from January 2020 to July 2025. Primary outcomes were technical success (patency without adjacent vessel occlusion) and procedural safety (absence of intraprocedural vessel rupture). Secondary outcomes included in-stent thrombosis, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH), and functional status (mRS and NIHSS) at discharge and follow-up. Results Among 37 patients (median age 59.0 years; 67.6% male; 78.4% Black), all had severe (70-99%) stenosis. Most treated vessels were M1 MCA (37.8%), basilar artery (27.0%), and intracranial ICA (16.2%). Technical success was achieved in all cases (100%) with immediate post-procedural vessel patency. No intraoperative vessel rupture or bleeding occurred. sICH occurred in 8.1% and in-stent thrombosis in 16.2%. Median discharge NIHSS was 11.0 and mRS 4.0. Conclusions "Submaximal" stenting—deliberate under-expansion at sub-nominal pressures—with Resolute OnyxTM and Onyx FrontierTM drug-eluting stents appears technically feasible and safe as an acute rescue strategy for ICAD-LVO stroke refractory to EVT. This novel approach warrants further investigation in larger, prospective, multicenter studies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Baskaran et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: