PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 8, 2026Nature0 citationsOpen Access

Foreshock-induced slip transients set mainshock nucleation timing

BFBarnaby FryerCentre National de la Recherche ScientifiqueDGDmitry GaragashDalhousie UniversityMLMathias LebihainCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique

Key Points

  • This research investigates how foreshocks can control the timing and characteristics of earthquake nucleation.
  • Conducted laboratory experiments using a rate-and-state-based Griffith-like rupture framework.
  • Analyzed the effects of foreshock size on transient sliding velocity during nucleation.
  • Extended theoretical findings to tectonic faults and natural earthquake scenarios.
  • Larger foreshocks induce a higher minimum sliding velocity (V min), leading to rapid transitions to dynamic rupture.
  • Small foreshocks result in prolonged quasi-static growth with very small impulse effects potentially halting ruptures.
  • Characterized nucleation slip distances of 0.3–3.0 mm, significantly smaller than those for dynamic rupture.

Abstract

Abstract Foreshocks are sometimes observed before earthquakes 1–13 , yet their role in controlling rupture nucleation remains unclear 1,11,14 . Classical models often assume that nucleation arises from slow, quasi-static slip governed primarily by fault weakening 15–21 , typically neglecting impulsive precursory events. Here we show, using laboratory experiments and a rate-and-state-based Griffith-like rupture framework 22 , that foreshocks, when they occur at the onset of or during nucleation, can fundamentally regulate earthquake initiation. We find that the slip burst induced by foreshocks imparts a transient sliding velocity, V min , whose magnitude is set by foreshock size and which robustly predicts both nucleation duration and spatial length. Larger foreshocks generate higher V min and trigger a more rapid transition to dynamic rupture, whereas smaller foreshocks produce long-duration quasi-static growth and very small impulses lead to ruptures entirely arresting. Extending our theoretical framework to tectonic faults, we show that foreshock and associated slow-slip sequences preceding natural earthquakes seem to follow the same scaling. These observations allow us to constrain realistic characteristic nucleation slip distances of 0.3–3.0 mm, orders of magnitude smaller than those inferred for dynamic rupture 23 . Our results demonstrate that foreshock-induced transients set the timing and potential detectability of earthquake nucleation 24 .

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Fryer et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69fd7ec6bfa21ec5bbf0704bhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-026-10497-5
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Fault size–dependent fracture energy explains multiscale seismicity and cascading earthquakes2024 · 63 citations
  2. 2Dynamic Fracture Mechanics1990 · 1,339 citations
  3. 3Rupture to the Trench: Dynamic Rupture Simulations of the 11 March 2011 Tohoku Earthquake2013 · 167 citations
  4. 4Modeling of rock friction: 1. Experimental results and constitutive equations1979 · 3,100 citations
  5. 5The precursory phase of large earthquakes2023 · 76 citations