Randomized trial highlights efficacy of PARP inhibitors in prostate cancer, suggesting strategies to mitigate resistance.
Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) have reshaped therapy for advanced prostate cancer, yet durable benefit remains concentrated in BRCA1/2-altered tumors, especially BRCA2, and most responders eventually relapse. Here, we frame PARPi response and resistance through a unifying model in which DNA damage response (DDR) rewiring (e.g., homologous recombination repair (HRR) restoration, fork protection, checkpoint tolerance, and altered drug handling) converges with treatment-induced dormancy and quiescent therapy-tolerant residual states that sustain minimal residual disease (MRD) under androgen receptor pathway inhibition (ARPI) and PARP blockade. We synthesize clinical and translational evidence for PARPi monotherapy and PARPi-based combinations across disease states. In first-line metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), PARPi plus ARPI consistently prolongs radiographic progression-free survival, with the greatest benefit in HRR-altered tumors, and emerging overall-survival signals in selected subgroups. In later-line settings, monotherapy activity is most robust in BRCA2-mutated disease, whereas non-BRCA HRR alterations show heterogeneous and often modest responses, underscoring the need for biomarkers beyond gene panels. We also discuss combination strategies with DDR-targeting agents, radioligand therapies, and immunotherapy, and summarize ongoing phase III programs in metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC). Finally, we outline practical considerations for biomarker-informed patient selection, monitoring, sequencing, and toxicity management, with particular emphasis on intercepting MRD and resistance evolution.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Matsuoka et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: