Restricted bundle of academic position papers and standards across 16 fields, highlighting governance implications.
Restricted bundle of 88 field position papers + standards applications across 16 FELD areas: AI_ADDICTION (clinical guide, screening, policy brief, research design), AUTONOMOUS_VEHICLES, COGNITIVE_DECLINE, CONTENT_AUTHENTICITY, DEFENSE_AI, DYNASTY_GOVERNANCE, EU_REGULATION (DIN/IEEE/ISO/ITU/HLEG/AI-Office applications + position papers), EXEC_COACHING, GAME_NARRATIVE, MEGACHURCH_AI, PHARMA_NAMING, SPACE_POLICY, SPORTS_AI, THERAPEUTIC_AI, THINK_TANKS, VC_ASSESSMENT. Each FELD contains 5-15 academic-form papers covering field-position + governance + standards-body applications. Strict-Wissenschaft, position papers + governance applications only - commercial pitches/sales material excluded.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Andreas Ehstand (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: