Why the study?
What are the predictors of mechanical dyssynchrony assessed by gated SPECT MPI in patients with LVEF ≤50%?
What are the predictors of mechanical dyssynchrony assessed by gated SPECT MPI in patients with LVEF ≤50%?
Gated SPECT MPI reveals a high prevalence of mechanical dyssynchrony in patients with impaired ventricular function, which correlates with LV function and perfusion parameters rather than QRS width alone.
Mechanical dyssynchrony by gated SPECT associates with perfusion and function metrics in reduced EF; leaves open incremental value beyond QRS for therapy selection.
INTRODUCTION: Gated SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) has been used to quantify mechanical dyssynchrony. Mechanical dyssynchrony appears to be related to response to cardiac resynchronization therapy. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the presence and predictors of mechanical dyssynchrony in patients with impaired left ventricular function (LVEF) ≤50%. METHODS: The study included 143 consecutive patients referred for gated SPECT MPI with LVEF ≤50%. Gated SPECT MPI was performed according to a stress/rest protocol acquiring images with Tc 99m-tetrofosmin. Emory Cardiac Toolbox software was used for phase analysis and a standard deviation (SD) ≥43° was considered to indicate mechanical dyssynchrony. RESULTS: Mechanical dyssynchrony was present in 53.1% of the patients. Its predictors were diabetes (OR 2.0, p≤0.05), summed stress score (OR 1.1, p≤0.0005), summed rest score (OR 1.1, p≤0.0001), end-diastolic volume (OR 1.0, p≤0.0001), LVEF (OR 0.9, p≤0.0001), LVEF ≤35% (OR 3.1, p≤0.005) and LVEF ≤35% and QRS ≥120 ms (OR 3.5, p≤0.05). In this study QRS width and QRS ≥120 ms were not predictors of mechanical dyssynchrony. CONCLUSIONS: Myocardial perfusion imaging can be used to assess mechanical dyssynchrony. In patients with impaired ventricular function mechanical dyssynchrony was highly prevalent and was related to parameters of left ventricular function and perfusion.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ferreira et al. (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: