Population-based study examines predictive value of blood biomarkers for long-term stroke recurrence, suggesting implications for prevention strategies.
Background and aims Some blood biomarkers have been shown to predict early recurrent stroke but long-term predictive value is uncertain, particularly if samples are taken during the acute phase. We assessed whether blood biomarkers improve 10-year risk prediction in intensively treated patients after TIA/stroke. Methods We studied 12 blood biomarkers related to inflammation, neuronal injury, and thrombosis after TIA/stroke in a population-based study (OXVASC; 2002-2011) with follow-up until 2025. We used cox and negative binomial regressions to assess associations between each log-transformed biomarker (per SD increase) and recurrent stroke (first event and total number), adjusted for age, sex, and vascular risk factors. Results Among 1,292 patients (mean age 73.1 ± 13.2 years; 47.8% male), 365 recurrent strokes occurred in 280 patients over 11,336 patient-years. Several inflammatory biomarkers were associated with 10-year risk of recurrence (adjusted IRR: IL6 = 1.21, 95%CI 1.04-1.42; C-reactive protein = 1.20, 1.05–1.37; TNF receptor-1 = 1.24, 1.05-1.46). Moreover, clustering of elevated inflammatory markers was associated with higher recurrence risk (HR per marker in top quartile = 1.21, 1.08–1.36; P < 0.001), higher burden of recurrence (IRR = 1.31, 1.15-1.50, P < 0.001), which also remained up to 10 years (90 days: 1.24; 90 days–1 year: 1.24; 1–5 years: 1.22; 5–10 years: 1.34). Associations were similar in TIA and minor stroke and across aetiological subtypes. Conclusions In this large population-based cohort, individual inflammatory biomarkers showed some value for long-term prediction of recurrent stroke. However, clustering of elevated inflammatory markers was more strongly associated with long-term recurrence, supporting ongoing trials of anti-inflammatory strategies for secondary prevention. Conflict of interest All authors have nothing to disclose.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: