Randomized trial examines emulsifier performance of polysaccharides in foams and emulsions, suggesting potential in food applications.
This study focused on the interfacial properties of Poria cocos peel crude polysaccharides (PCSCP) under different concentrations (0.0001%–0.1%, w/w), pH values (3.0–11.0), and ionic strengths (0–500 mM). The results showed that, with increasing PCSCP concentration, electrostatic repulsion gradually increased. At 0.1%, the absolute zeta potential (|ζ|) reached a maximum (35.3 mV) and particle size decreased to the minimum (156.7 nm), resulting in the highest interfacial pressures (π) at the air‐water and oil–water interfaces (35.31 and 16.80 mN/m, respectively). Meanwhile, interfacial film strength and emulsion viscosity increased, and 0.1% PCSCP exhibited superior emulsion and foam stability (ESI = 106.348 min, FS = 92.59%). pH also significantly affected PCSCP interfacial behavior. At pH 3.0, PCSCP showed the strongest electrostatic repulsion (|ζ| = 36.03 mV) and the smallest particle size (573.33 nm), giving outstanding air‐water and oil–water interfacial properties: π values of 36.96 and 16.64 mN/m, diffusion rates ( K diff ) of 0.604 and 0.220 mN/m/s −0.5 , and elastic moduli ( E d ) of 74.32 and 57.64 mN/m, respectively. These results were consistent with the best foaming performance (FA = 120.77%, FS = 78.35%) and emulsifying performance (EAI = 77.24 m 2 /g, ESI = 150.38 min). Notably, PCSCP showed interface‐dependent dual effects in Na + environments. Compared with the control, Na + accelerated PCSCP diffusion and enhanced interfacial film elasticity at the air‐water interface, significantly improving foaming performance. In contrast, Na + weakened oil–water interfacial construction by screening intermolecular electrostatic repulsion, thereby reducing emulsion stability. Overall, PCSCP shows strong potential as a clean‐label natural emulsifier and foam stabilizer.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cao et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: