PulseTrendingJournal ClubResearchersJournalsExplore
Instagram
HomeTrendingJournal ClubExplore
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 8, 2026European Journal of International RelationsOpen Access

Strategic acquiescence: revolutionary survival versus international transformation

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

CHCatherine Hirst

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Conceptualizes and maps strategic acquiescence, highlighting the trade-offs revolutionaries face in changing international order.

Key Points

  • This research aims to explore the disconnect between revolutionary aspirations for international transformation and the actions taken to achieve it.
  • Developed a novel dataset on revolutionary pragmatism from 1900 to 2020
  • Mapped and typologized the concept of strategic acquiescence
  • Analyzed historical cases of revolutionaries' responses to international dynamics
  • Identified distinct pathways through which revolutionaries prioritized survival over international transformation
  • Demonstrated how revolutionary survival limits aspirations for global change
  • Expanded understanding of the challenges in enacting radical shifts in world politics

Cite This Study

Catherine Hirst (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69fd7fa1bfa21ec5bbf0820chttps://doi.org/10.1177/13540661261438669
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share