What makes a peace process a ‘success story’? In Northern Ireland, suicidality rose sharply after the 1998 Good Friday Agreement, even as the peace process became internationally celebrated as a model of conflict settlement. International Relations and peacebuilding scholarship have largely recognised suicide only when it emerges as political self-sacrifice – terrorism, hunger strike and self-immolation – while ‘ordinary’ or everyday suicides are politically and institutionally routed to public health, psychology and sociology and thereby risk being depoliticised. Against this division of labour, the article theorises post-conflict civilian suicidality as a peace governance outcome; namely, an immanent, structural effect of liberal peacebuilding’s logic of containment, stabilisation and political trade-offs. Drawing on Lacanian psychoanalysis, I argue that peace processes can be analysed as death-driven structures. They reproduce themselves by repeating practices that secure negative peace while undercutting positive peace, including healing, reconciliation, integration and care. This self-undermining repetition casts off what I call surplus violence: the remainder generated by the subtraction of negative peace gains from positive peace aspirations. I conceptualise the governance of this remainder as autoktonopolitics, that is, the circulation and distribution through which self-killing is made intelligible, normalised and absorbed as collateral, private or non-political. Empirically, the article draws on interviews in Northern Ireland from 2024 to 2026 to trace technologies of autoktonopower across peace funding, consociational governance, post-paramilitary appeasement and territorialised coercive community control. The article redescribes peace as a question of post-conflict order reproduction, opening a research agenda for Lacanian peacebuilding studies and the libidinal economies of peace processes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Albert Cullell Cano (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: