Key result
Phase III SIFT trial evaluates IVT vs standard care for acute ischemic stroke after factor Xa inhibitor ingestion.
Why the study?
Patients with recent FXa inhibitor ingestion are excluded from IVT due to hemorrhagic concerns, but observational data suggest IVT may be safe and effective, warranting randomized trials.
Does intravenous thrombolysis improve early neurological improvement in acute ischemic stroke patients with recent ingestion of factor Xa inhibitors?
RCT
Open-label, blinded-endpoint
2:1
Yes
Does intravenous thrombolysis improve early neurological improvement in acute ischemic stroke patients with recent ingestion of factor Xa inhibitors?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports IVT for AIS despite recent FXa inhibitor use; first RCT evidence challenges guideline exclusion and extends observational data.[[1]](https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12082013/)[[2]](https://eso-stroke.
Background and aims Intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) is an effective treatment for disabling acute ischemic stroke (AIS) when administered within 4.5 hours of symptom onset. Patients with recent ingestion of factor Xa (FXa) inhibitors (within the last 48 hours) are currently excluded from IVT in existing guidelines due to concerns about hemorrhagic complications. However, observational studies suggest that IVT may be both safe and effective in this patient group, highlighting the need for randomized controlled trials. Methods To evaluate the efficacy and safety of IVT in AIS patients with recent ingestion (last 48 hours) of an FXa inhibitor who are otherwise eligible for IVT. Results This is a pragmatic, multicenter, phase III, randomized, open-label, blinded-endpoint (PROBE) trial. Patients with disabling AIS receiving FXa inhibitor are randomized in a 2:1 ratio to IVT or standard care without IVT. The primary endpoint, early neurological improvement (ENI), is analyzed using logistic regression adjusted for age, baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score, and time to treatment. Safety is continuously monitored, with predefined early stopping rules for symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH). Conclusions The primary outcome is ENI, defined as a reduction of ≥8 points on the NIHSS or an NIHSS score of 0–1 at 24 hours (22-36h). Secondary outcomes include neurological improvement, infarct volume, any ICH, sICH, functional outcome assessed by the modified Rankin Scale at 90 days and mortality. Conflict of interest
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Schultz et al. (2026) conducted an RCT in Acute ischemic stroke. Intravenous thrombolysis vs. Standard care without intravenous thrombolysis was evaluated on Early neurological improvement (ENI), defined as a reduction of ≥8 points on the NIHSS or an NIHSS score of 0–1 at 24 hours. Intravenous thrombolysis is being evaluated against standard care in the phase III SIFT trial for acute ischemic stroke patients with recent factor Xa inhibitor ingestion.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: