Bibliometric analysis uncovers links between land use transitions and farmers' well-being, suggesting vital research paths.
Land use transition and its effects on farmers’ well-being are central to the transformation and sustainable development of resource-exhausted areas (REAs). While extensive research has emerged in recent years, there remains a critical lack of systematic synthesis and clarity regarding key scientific issues in this domain. To bridge this research gap, an R-based bibliometric analysis was conducted on an extensive corpus encompassing 8245 papers on land use transition and 931 papers on farmers’ well-being published between 2001 and 2024, systematically investigating the mechanisms of transition, regional transformation dynamics, and the multi-dimensional determinants of well-being. The findings indicate that: (1) land use transition research has evolved from spatial patterns to management strategies, yet it lacks comprehensive regional and multi-scale characterization; (2) although land use is recognized as central to REA studies, the underlying theoretical frameworks require significant refinement; and (3) research on farmers’ well-being has shifted from broad ecosystem services to multidimensional micro-analyses, though the explicit correlation mechanisms with land use remain unclear. Based on these insights, four pivotal directions are identified for future research in REAs: establishing theoretical and analytical frameworks that link land use transitions to well-being under regional development logic; uncovering the spatiotemporal processes and multi-scale driving mechanisms of these transitions; quantitatively measuring their impacts on multidimensional well-being; and developing regulatory policies that balance regional coordination with well-being enhancement. This review provides a robust scientific foundation for optimizing land resources and promoting sustainable human–environment interactions in REAs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: