PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 8, 2026Clinical Neuroradiology1 citationsOpen Access

Evans’ Index and Frontal and Occipital Horn Ratio in Correlation to Volumetric Data of Lateral Ventricles in a Population-based MRI Study

View Full Paper
DCDaniel CantréRBRobin BülowEREiko Rathmann

Key Points

  • To evaluate the correlation between Evans’ Index and Frontal and Occipital Horn Ratio with lateral ventricle volumes, and define age- and sex-specific thresholds.
  • Analyzed data from 3058 subjects aged 21–90 from the Study of Health in Pomerania (SHIP).
  • Utilized T1 weighted MPRAGE MRI to obtain brain images and calculate lateral ventricle volumes.
  • Performed ROC analyses to assess the performance of Evans’ Index and Frontal and Occipital Horn Ratio.
  • Average values were 0.257 for Evans’ Index and 0.363 for Frontal and Occipital Horn Ratio.
  • Evans’ Index exhibited specificity of 97.1% and sensitivity of 55.3% for ventricular enlargement at the cut-off > 0.3.
  • Frontal and Occipital Horn Ratio showed a stronger correlation with lateral ventricle volumes (rs = 0.741) compared to Evans’ Index (rs = 0.656).

Abstract

Abstract Purpose Evans’ Index (EI) and Frontal and Occipital Horn Ratio (FOHR) are routinely used in screening for enlargement of the ventricular system. However, both lack epidemiological definition of normal values in adults. In a representative, randomized sample of adult normal population in Germany we studied the correlation of lateral ventricle volumes with EI and FOHR to evaluate the performance of pre-established cutoff values of EI > 0.3 and FOHR > 0.37, and to introduce age- and sex-specific thresholds, which for FOHR do not yet exist in adults. Methods In a population-based sample of 3058 subjects of the “Study of Health in Pomerania” (SHIP), aged 21–90 years, brain imaging with T1 weighted MPRAGE with 1 mm isotropic voxel-size was obtained. We semiautomatically determined the volumes of the lateral ventricles and manually performed measurements to calculate EI and FOHR for every individual. Besides descriptive statistics, ROC analyses were carried out to determine test performance of both parameters. Negative and positive predictive values were derived from contingency analyses. Results Average values were 0.257 ± 0.025 for EI and 0.363 ± 0.024 for FOHR, with sex- and age-depending differences. Using the established cut-off value of EI > 0.3, this index achieved high specificity of 97.1% and moderate sensitivity of 55.3% for diagnosing ventricular enlargement. Using a threshold of > 0.4, FOHR achieved a specificity of 93.4%, and higher sensitivity of 81.4%. FOHR showed stronger correlation with actual lateral ventricle volumes, as compared to EI (r s FOHR = 0.741 vs. r s EI = 0.656; p 0.4 for FOHR in adults, with emphasis on specific caveats.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Cantré et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69fd8021bfa21ec5bbf087a7https://doi.org/10.1007/s00062-026-01665-1
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper