Systematic review evaluates ultrasound accuracy for verifying NGT position in non-ventilated adults, suggesting faster alternatives to chest x-ray.
Background and aims Nasogastric tube (NGT) placement is common in stroke care, however incorrect positioning posing a serious risk of aspiration pneumonia. When gastric aspirate pH testing is unsuccessful, chest x-ray is the current reference standard for NGT position verification; however, this process can take many hours leaving stroke patients without fluids and nutrition for extended periods of time. Bedside ultrasound has emerged as a potential alternative, but existing reviews have largely focused on ventilated or paediatric populations. This review evaluates the diagnostic accuracy of bedside ultrasound for confirming NGT position in non-ventilated adult patients. Methods A systematic review of diagnostic test accuracy studies will be conducted following PRISMA-DTA guidance. Electronic databases including Embase, MEDLINE, the Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched. Eligible studies included non-ventilated adult patients requiring NGT position confirmation, using bedside ultrasound as the index test and chest x-ray as the reference standard. Two reviewers independently screened studies, extract data, and assess methodological quality using GRADE, QUADAS-2, and QUADAS-C tools. Extracted outcomes including sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values were assessed. Results A total of 64 trials were initally identified, after screening 5 trials were deemed suitable for this review including a total of 802 patients. overall sensitivites ranging from 64% - 99.8% Conclusions This review highlighting an evidence gap that warrents exploration. Bedside ultrasound may offer a faster, safer, and more cost-effective alternative to chest x-ray, with potential benefits for patient experience, clinical pathways, and healthcare resource utilisation. Further research using newer point-of-care ultrasound scanners and defind protocols should be explored Conflict of interest Surabhi Saxena nothing to disclose Holly Maguire nothing to disclose
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Maguire et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: