Why the study?
Does transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) acutely improve coronary hemodynamics in patients with severe aortic stenosis?
Does transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) acutely improve coronary hemodynamics in patients with severe aortic stenosis?
TAVI acutely improves fractional flow reserve (FFR) via lowering of mean aortic pressure, but does not acutely affect coronary flow reserve (CFR).
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
TAVI-associated FFR rise without CFR change may reflect afterload reduction; leaves open impact on post-TAVI ischemia assessment.
AIMS: In this study we aimed to test the hypothesis that left ventricular (LV) afterload reduction in severe aortic valve stenosis (AS) by transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) acutely improves coronary haemodynamics. METHODS AND RESULTS: This was a prospective, pathophysiologic study in 40 patients with severe AS undergoing TAVI. Endpoints were determined invasively immediately before and after TAVI without altering coronary stenotic lesions if present. Myocardial hyperaemia was induced by intravenous adenosine. The primary study endpoints were coronary flow reserve (thermodilution-derived CFR), and fractional flow reserve (FFR). The secondary study endpoint was coronary collateral flow index (CFI) as obtained during a one-minute coronary balloon occlusion. CFR was 1.9±0.9 before TAVI and 2.0±1.0 after TAVI (p=0.72). FFR was 0.90±0.08 before TAVI and 0.93±0.08 after TAVI (p=0.0021). The TAVI-induced increase in FFR was related to a significant decrease in hyperaemic mean aortic pressure from 71±16 mmHg before TAVI to 67±15 mmHg after TAVI (p=0.0099). Hyperaemic CFI increased from 0.127±0.083 before to 0.146±0.090 after TAVI (p=0.0508). CONCLUSIONS: CFR appears not to be acutely affected by LV afterload reduction among patients with severe AS in response to TAVI. However, it acutely improves FFR; this occurs via lowering of mean aortic pressure. Hyperaemic coronary collateral flow index tends to augment in response to TAVI.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Stoller et al. (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: