Why the study?
Does normal saline infusion during tilt testing predict response to high-salt diet treatment in children with neurocardiac syncope?
Does normal saline infusion during tilt testing predict response to high-salt diet treatment in children with neurocardiac syncope?
Normal saline infusion during tilt testing effectively identifies children with neurocardiac syncope who will respond favorably to high-salt diet and fludrocortisone therapy.
May identify high-salt diet responders in pediatric neurocardiac syncope; leaves open need for randomized confirmation.
Head-up tilt test has been useful in evaluating children with neurocardiac syncope. In this study patients with positive baseline and isoproterenol tests had repeat tilt testing done after normal saline infusion. If the symptoms persisted, the test was then repeated with phenylephrine infusion. Of the 101 patients studied, 58 (57%) had a positive tilt sign. Normal saline infusion was given to 53 patients. Three patients were excluded because of structural heart disease. Fifty patients (aged 14 +/- 4 years) comprised the study group. Forty-two (84%) of 50 patients had a negative repeat tilt sign after normal saline infusion, and these patients were treated with 0.5 to 1 gm of salt three times a day and/or fludrocortisone (20 patients). Of the 8 (16%) patients who did not respond to normal saline infusion, 5 had negative results when given phenylephrine and were treated with pseudoephedrine. Follow-up data on 42 patients (range 4 to 40 months, median 18 months) showed that all 35 patients who responded to normal saline were either asymptomatic or had improved. Two patients were successfully treated with pseudoephedrine; however, two patients in this group required pacemaker therapy. We conclude that (1) normal saline infusion mitigates the hemodynamic effects of neurocardiac syncope, (2) high-salt diet treatment in these patients was economical and effective, and (3) failure to respond to normal saline test may indicate a less favorable prognosis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mangru et al. (1996) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: