Why the study?
Do measures of obesity (BMI and waist circumference) predict incident heart failure in adults without baseline cardiovascular disease?
Do measures of obesity (BMI and waist circumference) predict incident heart failure in adults without baseline cardiovascular disease?
The association between obesity (measured by BMI or waist circumference) and incident heart failure is largely mediated by downstream obesity-related conditions such as hypertension and dysglycemia.
Obesity measures may not independently predict HF beyond related conditions; leaves open direct effects in observational cohorts without CVD.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the strength of association of body mass index (BMI) and waist circumference (WC) with incident heart failure (HF), exploring our associations by ethnicity and age. DESIGN AND METHODS: 6,809 participants, aged 45-84 years old, without clinical cardiovascular disease (2000-2002), from the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis were included. Cox-Proportional hazards models were used to examine associations of BMI and WC with incident HF. The predictive abilities of BMI and WC were compared using receiver operating characteristic curves. RESULTS: Over a median follow-up of 7.6 years, there were 176 cases. BMI and WC were associated with incident HF in men (1.33 [1.10-1.61] and 1.38 [1.18-1.62], respectively] and women (1.70 [1.33-2.17] and 1.64 [1.29-2.08], respectively). These associations became non-significant after adjusting for obesity-related conditions (hypertension, dysglycemia, hypercholesterolemia, left ventricular hypertrophy, kidney disease, and inflammation). The associations of BMI and WC did not vary significantly by ethnicity or age-group, but were inverse in Hispanic men. The area under the curve for BMI and WC was 0.749 and 0.750, respectively, in men and 0.782 and 0.777, respectively, in women. CONCLUSIONS: The association between obesity and incident HF is largely mediated by obesity-related conditions. BMI and WC have similar predictive abilities for incident HF.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ebong et al. (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: