Why the study?
Does primary angioplasty provide myocardial salvage in STEMI patients presenting late (12-72 h) compared to early presenters (<12 h)?
Does primary angioplasty provide myocardial salvage in STEMI patients presenting late (12-72 h) compared to early presenters (<12 h)?
Primary angioplasty in STEMI patients presenting between 12-72 hours yields substantial myocardial salvage, suggesting potential benefit beyond the traditional 12-hour window.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support salvage with late PCI in selected STEMI patients; leaves open whether routine use improves outcomes.
AIMS: Primary angioplasty for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is recommended only if symptom duration is <12 h. We evaluated final infarct size (FIS) and myocardial salvage in early presenters (<12 h) vs. late presenters (12-72 h) undergoing primary angioplasty. METHODS AND RESULTS: Myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) was performed acutely to assess area at risk (AAR) before angioplasty and repeated after 30 days to assess FIS (% of LV myocardium), salvage index (% non-infarcted AAR), and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Late presenters (n = 55) compared with early presenters (n = 341) had larger median FIS [14% (inter-quartile range 3-30) vs. 7% (2-18), P = 0.005], lower salvage index [53% (27-89) vs. 69% (45-91), P = 0.05], and lower LVEF [48% (44-58%) vs. 53% (47-59), P = 0.04]. However, FIS, salvage index, and LVEF correlated weakly with symptom duration (R(2)-values <0.10). In patients with TIMI-flow 0 (n = 247), late presenters had lower salvage index than early presenters [44% (23-73) vs. 57% (42-86), P = 0.03], but substantial salvage (>50% of AAR) was observed in 41% of late presenters despite total infarct-artery occlusion. CONCLUSION: FIS is larger in late presenters (>12 h) than early presenters after primary angioplasty for STEMI. However, substantial myocardial salvage can be obtained beyond the 12 h limit, even when the infarct-related artery is totally occluded.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Busk et al. (2009) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: