Key result
Ischaemic preconditioning cuts infarct size by ~92% versus controls in a porcine AMI model.
Why the study?
Reliable methods for assessment of tissue reperfusion early after revascularizing therapy for acute myocardial infarction are needed, and the reliability of myocardial perfusion imaging with Tc sestamibi during early reperfusion is uncertain due to effects of ischaemic preconditioning.
Does myocardial perfusion imaging with 99mTc sestamibi reliably reflect infarct size reduction by ischaemic preconditioning in a porcine model of ischemia-reperfusion?
Does myocardial perfusion imaging with 99mTc sestamibi reliably reflect infarct size reduction by ischaemic preconditioning in a porcine model of ischemia-reperfusion?
Absolute Event Rate: 0.07% vs 0.83%
p-value: p=<0.001
Myocardial perfusion imaging with 99mTc sestamibi during early reperfusion reliably measures relative infarct size reduction after ischaemic preconditioning in a porcine model.
Validates MIBI MPI for infarct sizing in porcine ischemia-reperfusion models; leaves open translation to clinical cardioprotection trials.
OBJECTIVE: Reliable methods for assessment of tissue reperfusion early after revascularizing therapy for acute myocardial infarction are needed. Myocardial perfusion imaging with Tc sestamibi (MIBI MPI) may serve this purpose. Usage during early reperfusion may be problematic e.g. due to ischaemic preconditioning (IP), which is important in inducing ischaemic tolerance. It is mediated through the opening of mitochondrial K ATP channels, reducing mitochondrial membrane potential. This may, as well as ischaemia per se, affect cellular uptake of Tc sestamibi. We therefore studied the reliability of MIBI MPI during early reperfusion as a measure of infarct size and its reduction by ischaemic preconditioning. METHODS AND RESULTS: We compared MIBI MPI (cut-off, 45% of maximum pixel count) with a histochemical method in a porcine model, nine controls and eight IP pigs, using 45 min catheter based coronary occlusion of the left anterior descending artery. Infarct size (IS) was determined relative to the area at risk (AAR). The relative infarct size (IS/AAR) after 120 min reperfusion estimated by MPI was 0.83 (0.17) in controls vs 0.07 (0.12) in the IP group (mean (SD), P<0.001). The corresponding values for histochemistry were controls 0.77 (0.19) vs IP 0.07 (0.11), P<0.001. IS/AAR measured by MPI and histochemistry were correlated significantly (r=0.93, P<0.001). Furthermore, IS relative to left ventricular mass (IS/LV) determined by autoradiography and histochemistry correlated (r=0.93, P<0.001). MPI overestimated IS/LV and AAR/LV by approximately a factor of 2 compared with histochemistry or autoradiography. CONCLUSION: MIBI MPI during early reperfusion is a reliable measure of relative infarct size reduction after ischaemic preconditioning, supporting use for stratification for adjunctive therapy and for assessment of prognosis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kristensen et al. (2004) studied Acute myocardial infarction (n=17). Ischaemic preconditioning vs. Controls was evaluated on Relative infarct size (IS/AAR) estimated by MPI (p=<0.001). Ischaemic preconditioning significantly reduced relative infarct size measured by MIBI MPI compared to controls (0.07 vs 0.83, P<0.001) in a porcine model of acute myocardial infarction.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: