Key result
16-slice MDCT detects significant coronary lesions with ~82% sensitivity compared to invasive angiography.
Why the study?
Recent technical improvements in MDCT coronary imaging have suggested high diagnostic accuracy, but evaluation of 16-multi-detector spiral CT with 188 ms temporal resolution was needed.
Does 16-slice MDCT with 188 ms temporal resolution accurately detect significant coronary artery lesions compared to invasive coronary angiography in patients with suspected CAD?
Cross-Sectional (n=72)
Does 16-slice MDCT with 188 ms temporal resolution accurately detect significant coronary artery lesions compared to invasive coronary angiography in patients with suspected CAD?
16-slice MDCT with 188 ms temporal resolution demonstrates high diagnostic accuracy for detecting significant coronary artery disease compared to invasive angiography.
OBJECTIVES: The aim of our study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of 16-multi-detector spiral computed tomography (MDCT) with 188 ms temporal resolution. BACKGROUND: Because of rapid technical innovations, MDCT coronary imaging has significantly improved in the last five years. Recent results indicate a high diagnostic accuracy, especially in patients with clinical suspicion of coronary artery disease (CAD). METHODS: A total of 72 consecutive patients (30 women, 42 men, age 64 +/- 10 years) scheduled for invasive coronary angiography (ICA) because of suspected CAD were additionally studied by MDCT (Sensation 16 Speed 4D, Siemens, Forchheim, Germany). Thirty-seven of 72 patients (51%) received an additional beta-blockade before MDCT because of heart rates >65 beats/min. The MDCT scans were analyzed regarding the presence of coronary artery lesions. Results were compared with ICA. RESULTS: All 72 scans showed diagnostic image quality (heart rate: 64.1 +/- 9.2 beats/min, calcium mass: 86 +/- 156 mg). Thirteen coronary segments were evaluated in each patient. Sixty-two of 936 (6.6%) segments showed a nondiagnostic image quality. All segments were included in the analysis. A total of 117 relevant lesions (diameter stenosis >50%) were detected using ICA, and 96 of 117 (82%) were detected by MDCT. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values for the whole study group were as follows: 82%, 98%, 87%, and 97%, respectively. The correct clinical diagnosis of presence or absence of significant CAD was obtained in 65 of 72 (90%) patients. All stenoses were detected by MDCT in 52 of 72 (72%) patients. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate a high diagnostic accuracy of 16-slice MDCT with improved temporal resolution.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kuettner et al. (2004) conducted a cross-sectional in Suspected coronary artery disease (CAD) (n=72). 16-multi-detector spiral computed tomography (MDCT) with 188 ms temporal resolution vs. Invasive coronary angiography (ICA) was evaluated on Detection of relevant coronary artery lesions (diameter stenosis >50%). 16-slice MDCT with 188 ms temporal resolution detected significant coronary artery lesions with 82% sensitivity and 98% specificity compared to invasive coronary angiography.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: