Key result
Elevated Lipoprotein(a) was associated with increased MACE risk, reaching an adjusted HR of 1.93 (P<0.001) for the 91st-100th percentile in patients without baseline ASCVD.
Why the study?
The optimal Lipoprotein(a) threshold for cardiovascular risk assessment may differ based on baseline atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease status.
Does elevated Lipoprotein(a) increase the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events in patients with and without baseline atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease?
Cohort (n=16,419)
Yes
Does elevated Lipoprotein(a) increase the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events in patients with and without baseline atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease?
Elevated Lp(a) is independently associated with long-term MACE in both primary and secondary prevention cohorts, though the risk threshold may differ between these groups.
BACKGROUND: Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is associated with an increased risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). However, whether the optimal Lp(a) threshold for risk assessment should differ based on baseline ASCVD status is unknown. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to assess the association between Lp(a) and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) among patients with and without baseline ASCVD. METHODS: We studied a retrospective cohort of patients with Lp(a) measured at 2 medical centers in Boston, Massachusetts, from 2000 to 2019. To assess the association of Lp(a) with incident MACE (nonfatal myocardial infarction [MI], nonfatal stroke, coronary revascularization, or cardiovascular mortality), Lp(a) percentile groups were generated with the reference group set at the first to 50th Lp(a) percentiles. Cox proportional hazards modeling was used to assess the association of Lp(a) percentile group with MACE. RESULTS: Overall, 16,419 individuals were analyzed with a median follow-up of 11.9 years. Among the 10,181 (62%) patients with baseline ASCVD, individuals in the 71st to 90th percentile group had a 21% increased hazard of MACE (adjusted HR: 1.21; P < 0.001), which was similar to that of individuals in the 91st to 100th group (adjusted HR: 1.26; P < 0.001). Among the 6,238 individuals without established ASCVD, there was a continuously higher hazard of MACE with increasing Lp(a), and individuals in the 91st to 100th Lp(a) percentile group had the highest relative risk with an adjusted HR of 1.93 (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In a large, contemporary U.S. cohort, elevated Lp(a) is independently associated with long-term MACE among individuals with and without baseline ASCVD. Our results suggest that the threshold for risk assessment may be different in primary vs secondary prevention cohorts.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Berman et al. (2024) conducted a cohort in Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (n=16,419). Elevated Lipoprotein(a) vs. 1st to 50th Lp(a) percentiles was evaluated on Major adverse cardiovascular events (nonfatal MI, nonfatal stroke, coronary revascularization, or cardiovascular mortality) (HR 1.93, p=<0.001). Elevated Lipoprotein(a) was associated with increased MACE risk, reaching an adjusted HR of 1.93 (P<0.001) for the 91st-100th percentile in patients without baseline ASCVD.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: