Why the study?
Do acute changes in coronary blood flow alter left ventricular end-diastolic wall thickness in anesthetized dogs?
Do acute changes in coronary blood flow alter left ventricular end-diastolic wall thickness in anesthetized dogs?
Acute changes in coronary blood flow directly alter left ventricular end-diastolic wall thickness, suggesting a dynamic role for coronary blood flow in calculations of LV mass and diastolic wall stress.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May confound LV mass and wall stress estimates with flow changes; leaves open translation to human diastolic function.
The effect of acute alterations in coronary blood flow (CBF) on left ventricular (LV) end-diastolic wall thickness was measured by reflected ultrasound in twelve anesthetized dogs. During five minutes of coronary ligation, wall thickness decreased from a control of 9.0 +/- 0.3 mm to 8.1 +/- 0.3 mm (P less than 0.001); during reperfusion (reactive hyperemia), wall thickness was greater than control (10.2 +/- 0.2 mm at one minute, P less than 0.001). Increased CBF produced by intracoronary nitroglycerin or papaverine resulted in transient increases in wall thickness from 8.9 +/- 0.1 mm to 9.7 +/- 0.2 at one minute (P less than 0.001) and 10.0 +/- 0.6 mm to 11.2 +/- 0.7 mm at one minute (P less than 0.001), respectively. The observed direct relation between CBF and wall thickness suggests a dynamic role for CBF in calculations of LV mass, diastolic wall stress, and myocardial stiffness constants.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gaasch et al. (1977) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: