Why the study?
Does catheter ablation improve outcomes in patients with structural heart disease and ventricular tachycardia?
Does catheter ablation improve outcomes in patients with structural heart disease and ventricular tachycardia?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This editorial provides an overview of the role, methodology, clinical outcomes, and innovative approaches in catheter ablation for ventricular tachycardia in patients with structural heart disease.
In patients with structural heart disease, ventricular tachycardia (VT) worsens the clinical condition and may severely affect the short- and long-term prognosis. Several therapeutic options can be considered for the management of this arrhythmia. Among others, catheter ablation, a closed-chest therapy, can prevent arrhythmia recurrences by abolishing the arrhythmogenic substrate. Over the last two decades, different techniques have been developed for an effective approach to both tolerated and untolerated VTs. The clinical outcome of patients undergoing ablation has been evaluated in multiple studies. This editorial gives an overview of the role, methodology, clinical outcome and innovative approaches in catheter ablation of VT.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Roberto De Ponti (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: