Why the study?
Does contrast-enhanced computed tomography accurately detect patent coronary bypass grafts compared to angiography in coronary bypass graft patients?
Does contrast-enhanced computed tomography accurately detect patent coronary bypass grafts compared to angiography in coronary bypass graft patients?
Contrast-enhanced CT is a promising, relatively noninvasive method for determining coronary bypass graft patency, showing 95% correlation with angiography.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support noninvasive graft assessment; leaves open whether CT can replace angiography.
Twenty-three coronary bypass graft patients were evaluated by a contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) technique to determine graft patency. Four to six 4.8-second sequenced scans with a 1-second interscan interval were obtained in each patient during the hand injection of 25-30 ml of contrast medium in a peripheral vein. Patency of grafts was determined by a characteristic contrast enhancement. The CT technique correlated with angiographic assessment of graft patency in 59 of 62 grafts (95%). We conclude that this relatively noninvasive technique shows promise as a method for determining coronary bypass graft patency.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Brundage et al. (1980) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: