PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 10, 2007Circulation620 citations

Transapical Minimally Invasive Aortic Valve Implantation

View Full Paper
TWThomas WaltherPSPaul SimonTDTodd Dewey

Key Points

  • The aim is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of transapical aortic valve implantation for high-risk patients with aortic stenosis.
  • Multicenter study with 59 patients operated on via minithoracotomy, some using extracorporeal circulation.

Structured PICO

Does transapical minimally invasive aortic valve implantation provide safe and effective outcomes in high-risk patients with aortic stenosis?

P
Population
59 consecutive high-risk patients with aortic stenosis, mean age 81+/-6 years, 44 female, average EuroSCORE predicted risk for mortality 27+/-14%.
I
Intervention
Transapical minimally invasive aortic valve implantation (TAP-AVI) via small anterolateral minithoracotomy using a pericardial xenograft fixed within a stainless steel, balloon expandable stent (Edwards SAPIEN THV).
O
Outcome
Initial multicenter results including procedural success, in-hospital mortality, and actuarial survivalhard clinical

Transapical minimally invasive aortic valve implantation is feasible and shows acceptable early safety and survival in high-risk patients with aortic stenosis.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To evaluate initial multicenter results with minimally invasive transapical aortic valve implantation (TAP-AVI) for high risk patients with aortic stenosis. METHODS AND RESULTS: TAP-AVI was performed via a small anterolateral minithoracotomy with or without femoro-femoral extracorporeal circulation (ECC) on the beating heart. A pericardial xenograft fixed within a stainless steel, balloon expandable stent (Edwards SAPIEN THV, Edwards Lifesciences) was used. Fifty-nine consecutive patients (81+/-6 years, 44 female) were operated on from 02/06 until 10/06 at 4 centers using fluoroscopic and echocardiographic visualization. Average EuroSCORE predicted risk for mortality was 27+/-14%. TAP valve positioning was performed successfully in 53 patients, 4 required early conversion to sternotomy. Implantation (23-mm valves in 19 and 26-mm valves in 40 patients) was performed on the beating heart during brief periods of rapid ventricular pacing. Thirty-one patients were operated on without cardiopulmonary bypass. Neither coronary artery obstruction nor migration of the prosthesis was observed, and all valves had good hemodynamic function. Echocardiography revealed minor paravalvular leakage in 26 patients (trace in 11, mild in 12, and severe in 3). Eight patients died in-hospital (13.6%) without any valve dysfunction. Actuarial survival was 75.7+/-5.9% at a follow-up interval of 110+/-77 days (range 1 to 255 days). CONCLUSIONS: TAP-AVI can be performed safely with good early results in high risk patients. Long-term valve performance as well as broader based applications of this promising approach will need to be studied.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Walther et al. (2007) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69fea87ac28c7d12f5f0cb79https://doi.org/10.1161/circulationaha.106.677237
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper