Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
July 1, 2012

Transapical aortic valve implantation - The Leipzig experience.

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Key result

Transapical transcatheter aortic valve implantation in high-risk patients with severe aortic stenosis achieved a procedural success rate of 90.2% and a 30-day survival rate of 90%.

Population

439 high-risk patients with aortic stenosis treated at a single center, mean age 81.5±6.4 years, 64.0%…

Design

Cohort

Follow-up

5 years

Authors

DHDavid HolzheyCardiac SurgeryMHM. HänsigDeutsches Herzzentrum der Charité
Thomas Walther
Thomas WaltherCardiac Surgery

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Implication

Supports feasibility in high-risk aortic stenosis; leaves open need for RCTs on durability and learning curve effects.

Study Design

Type

Observational (n=439)

Multicenter

No

Structured PICO

P
Population
439 high-risk patients (mean age 81.5 years, 64% female) with severe aortic stenosis undergoing transapical transcatheter aortic valve implantation, followed for up to 5 years.
I
Intervention
Transapical transcatheter aortic valve implantation (taTAVI) with an Edwards Sapien valve
O
Outcome
Procedural success, overall survival up to 5 years, and learning curve (occurrence of major complications)hard clinical

Transapical TAVI is a safe and effective procedure for high-risk patients with severe aortic stenosis, offering acceptable 5-year survival but requiring a significant learning curve of approximately 150 cases to reduce major complications.

Limitations

  • Retrospective nature of the analysis
  • Sparse long-term echocardiographic and clinical follow-up data

Cite This Study

Holzhey et al. (2012) conducted an observational in Severe aortic stenosis (n=439). Transapical transcatheter aortic valve implantation (taTAVI) was evaluated on Procedural success. Transapical transcatheter aortic valve implantation in high-risk patients with severe aortic stenosis achieved a procedural success rate of 90.2% and a 30-day survival rate of 90%.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a20a593e033bce76a911f1ehttps://doi.org/10.3978/j.issn.2225-319x.2012.06.09
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Progress and Current Status of Percutaneous Aortic Valve Replacement: Results of Three Device Generations of the CoreValve Revalving System2008 · 355 citations
  2. 2Transcatheter Versus Surgical Aortic-Valve Replacement in High-Risk Patients2012 · 642 citations
  3. 3Outcomes and complications of transcatheter aortic valve replacement using a balloon expandable valve according to the Valve Academic Research Consortium (VARC) guidelines2011 · 114 citations
  4. 4Transapical Minimally Invasive Aortic Valve Implantation2007 · 620 citations
  5. 5Transcatheter aortic valve implantation: first results from a multi-centre real-world registry2010 · 599 citations