Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Review highlights strategies to convert glioblastoma's cold tumor environment into an active immune state, suggesting implications for treatment efficacy.
Glioblastoma (GBM) represents one of the prototypical immune-cold tumors, characterized by profound immune suppression, T-cell exclusion, low neoantigen burden, and a highly immunosuppressive myeloid-dominant tumor microenvironment (TME). Despite advances in immunotherapy, including immune checkpoint blockade (ICB), CAR-T cells, and cancer vaccines, clinical benefits remain limited. This review synthesizes emerging evidence on multi-modal strategies aimed at reprogramming the cold TME into an immunologically active state. We highlight innate immune agonists, oncolytic virotherapy, precision nanomedicine, metabolic modulation, and radiotherapy-immune synergies. We further propose an integrated framework combining spatial immunomics, targeted delivery technology, and TME-specific engineering to overcome the therapeutic bottlenecks of GBM. Reprogramming the cold tumor microenvironment in glioblastoma through multi-modal immunotherapeutic strategies The left panel illustrates the cold tumor microenvironment, characterized by immune suppression, exclusion of effector T cells, low neoantigen burden, and dominance of immunosuppressive myeloid cells. The central schematic summarizes four major therapeutic approaches capable of converting this immune-silent state into an immunologically active phenotype: (1) innate immune agonists (e.g., STING, TLR, RIG-I stimulation), (2) oncolytic virotherapy, (3) precision nanomedicine for targeted delivery across the blood–brain barrier, and (4) metabolic modulation to overcome hypoxia- and lactate-driven immune dysfunction. The right panel depicts the resulting immunologically active tumor microenvironment, characterized by enhanced innate immune activation, increased T-cell infiltration, and restoration of anti-tumor immune activity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sung et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: