Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Assesses impact localization accuracy in spacecraft using FBG sensors, indicating improved monitoring efficacy.
Accurate impact localization on spacecraft structural panels subjected to contact loading by on-orbit servicing robots is critical for real-time structural health monitoring (SHM), yet remains challenging due to heterogeneous elastic wave propagation in complex aluminum structures with stiffener ribs and bonded joints. Conventional Received Signal Strength Indicator (RSSI)-based weighted centroid methods rely on fixed path-loss exponents that cannot accommodate spatially varying wave attenuation, resulting in position-dependent localization errors that worsen significantly near structural discontinuities. This paper proposes a Crow Search Algorithm (CSA)-optimized adaptive weighted centroid algorithm using distributed Fiber Bragg Grating (FBG) sensors, featuring three principal innovations: (i) a novel FBG wavelength-shift-to-RSSI amplitude mapping derived from elastic wave attenuation theory, bridging optical fiber sensing with centroid localization; (ii) per-event online weight optimization via CSA that adapts sensor contributions to each individual impact’s strain-wave signature; and (iii) a multi-objective fitness function simultaneously optimizing localization accuracy, noise robustness, and temporal consistency. The proposed method is validated across 200 impact events distributed over five representative positions on a 1 m3 Al6061 satellite-like structure with 64 FBG sensors (8 × 8 grid, 125 mm pitch), under three Gaussian noise levels (σ = 1%, 3%, 5% of signal RMS), and benchmarked against classical weighted centroid (WC), PSO-WC, GA-WC, DE-WC, and GWO-WC using paired t-tests (p < 0.01). CSA-WC achieves a mean localization error of 4.63 mm—an 83.29% improvement over classical WC and the lowest error among all five compared algorithms—with an average computation time of 0.14 s per event, satisfying real-time monitoring requirements.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: