Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Evaluates genetic influences on psychosis outcomes in cannabis users, suggesting significant implications for treatment.
Background: Only a subset of cannabis users develop persistent psychosis, implying that genetic vulnerability modulates risk. HLA-DR/DQ variation is a strong non-dopaminergic risk locus for schizophrenia, but its role in cannabis-related psychosis is unclear. Methods: We studied 296 cannabis users from Romanian psychiatric services, grouped as non-psychosis (0), non-schizophrenia psychosis (1) and schizophrenia (2). High-resolution HLA-DRB1, DRB3/4/5 and inferred DRB1-DQB1 haplotypes were tested using Fisher’s exact tests with FDR correction in a universal contrast (0 vs. 1+2) and 0-1-2 pairwise comparisons, with Firth logistic regression and resampling as supportive analyses. Results: In the universal analysis, DRB1*16, DRB5 and the DRB1*16-DQB1*05 haplotype were associated with roughly two- to threefold higher odds of psychosis, whereas DRB1*07 and DRB4/DRB3 paralogs showed protective effects or trends. In the 0-1-2 contrasts, DRB1*16 was enriched in non-schizophrenia psychosis. DRB4/DRB3 paralogs were under-represented in schizophrenia relative to both cannabis users without psychosis and those with non-schizophrenia psychosis, suggesting a schizophrenia-specific protective association. Firth models supported effect directions but were underpowered. Conclusions: HLA class II immunogenetic background may modify psychosis risk among cannabis users: DRB5/DRB1*16-containing backgrounds were associated with increased vulnerability, whereas DRB4/DRB3 paralogs were associated with reduced schizophrenia risk in this cohort. These findings are hypothesis-generating, do not establish causality, and warrant replication in larger cohorts.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Buciuta et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: