Randomized trial evaluates repair options for integral abutment bridges under thermal loading, suggesting effective strategies.
Integral abutment bridges (IABs) eliminate deck joints by rigidly connecting the superstructure to the abutments, reducing maintenance costs but introducing thermal restraint forces. When only one abutment is made integral, all thermally induced longitudinal movement concentrates at the remaining non-integral end, overloading bearings and concrete elements not designed for this condition. This paper investigates IAB behavior and evaluates two repair options for two, three-span continuous steel bridges on Interstate 635 in Kansas City, Kansas, which sustained progressive abutment damage following a unilateral integral conversion in 2005. A 2D finite element model was developed in LARSA 4D, incorporating composite superstructure elements, shell element abutments, beam element piles, and soil-structure interaction via distributed lateral springs. The model was analyzed under dead, live, braking, and thermal load combinations in accordance with AASHTO LRFD. Full integral conversion generates thermal restraint moments of approximately 813.5 kN-m (600 kip-ft) at the abutments, and pile stresses of 383.9 MPa (55.68 ksi) under Service I and 497.4 MPa (72.14 ksi) under Strength I combinations, both exceeding allowable limits. Elastomeric bearing pads at the non-integral abutment satisfied all stress limits without foundation modification and are recommended as a practical repair strategy for bridges in similar conditions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gull et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: