Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Prospective observational study evaluates diagnostic and therapeutic changes in minor trauma at follow-up visits, highlighting implications.
OBJECTIVE: Musculoskeletal trauma accounts for more than a third of emergency department visits, and accurate diagnosis and treatment can be challenging in the acute setting. The objective of our study was to evaluate the impact of a post-emergency orthopedic visit on diagnostic and therapeutic changes in patients with minor trauma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a prospective observational study in two French university hospitals. Adult patients referred to a post-emergency orthopedic visit for minor upper or lower limb trauma were included. Exclusion criteria included immediate surgical indication or injuries outside the limbs. Data collected during both initial and follow-up visits were compared to identify diagnostic changes (DCs) and therapeutic modifications (TMs), with TMs classified as resulting in either more or less intensive care. RESULTS: A total of 547 patients were included. DCs occurred in 14.4% patients (n=79), and TMs were made in 23.2% (n=127). Among patients with TMs, 61.4% (n=78) received less intensive treatment, while 38.6% (n=49) required more intensive care. The highest rates of DCs were observed for knee contusions (31.9%, n=15/47), wrist sprains (36.4%, n=4/11), and ankle sprains (18.8%, n=12/64). TMs leading to less intensive care were most frequently noted in ankle sprains (21.9%, n=14/64), knee contusions (21.3%, n=10/47), foot fractures (11.3%, n=7/62), and wrist fractures (10.6%, n=9/85). More intensive care was frequently required for wrist sprains (63.6%, n=7/11) and foot contusions (25%, n=3/12). Injuries such as shoulder dislocations (TM: 0%) and shoulder fractures (DC: 6.9%, TM: 10.3%) rarely led to modifications during the post-emergency visit. CONCLUSIONS: The post-emergency visit is of interest when targeting trauma pathologies at risk of diagnostic change or therapeutic modification.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Laudat et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: