Ecological study assesses incidence trends of human visceral leishmaniasis in Maranhão, indicating social vulnerability influence.
Background: Human visceral leishmaniasis remains a serious public health problem in Brazil, especially in the Northeast, where transmission persists in various vulnerable settings. Objective: This study aimed to assess temporal trends in the incidence of human visceral leishmaniasis in Maranhão, northeastern Brazil, with emphasis on social vulnerability and regional heterogeneity. Methods: We conducted an ecological, population-based study using confirmed cases of human visceral leishmaniasis reported in Maranhão from 2007 to 2024. Case data were obtained from the Brazilian Notifiable Diseases Information System, and population denominators were derived from national census counts and annual population estimates. Temporal trends in incidence rates were analyzed using joinpoint regression models, stratified by sex, age group, Social Vulnerability Index, and Health Regions. Results: A total of 7830 new cases of human visceral leishmaniasis were reported during the study period. Incidence showed a significant upward trend from 2007 to 2017, followed by a marked decline from 2018 to 2024. A heterogeneous pattern was observed in the average incidence rate of human visceral leishmaniasis across municipalities’ vulnerability categories, as measured by each subindex of the Social Vulnerability Index. Substantial regional heterogeneity was identified, with marked reductions in incidence in the Health Regions of Caxias, Timon, Barra do Corda, and Codó, whereas Santa Inês and Viana showed increasing trends. Conclusions: Despite the decline in incidence, human visceral leishmaniasis remains unevenly distributed throughout Maranhão. These findings underscore the need for geographically targeted interventions and the expansion of public health strategies aimed at preventing and controlling the disease.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pimentel et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: